Architecture reviews, cost optimisation, and platform design across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. We recommend what fits your workloads, not what pays us.
Short, high-leverage engagements aimed at decisions that are expensive to get wrong.
An independent read of your current design against reliability, security, cost, and operational load, with prioritised findings.
A line-by-line pass over your bill: right-sizing, commitment coverage, storage tiering, and the idle resources nobody owns.
Multi-account structure, network topology, identity, logging, and guardrails defined as code before teams start building.
IAM sprawl, public exposure, encryption gaps, and audit evidence assessed against the frameworks you are held to.
An honest assessment of where multi-cloud earns its complexity and where a single provider is simply the better answer.
Reference architectures, module libraries, and pairing sessions so your engineers can build without a ticket queue.
Most consulting work here runs two to six weeks and ends in a document your team can execute.
Read-only access to accounts and billing, plus interviews with the people who operate the platform day to day.
Architecture, spend, security posture, and operational practice assessed against your actual requirements rather than a generic checklist.
Prioritised findings with effort and impact against each, presented to both the engineering team and the people funding it.
Optional hands-on delivery of the top recommendations, or pairing while your team implements them.
Deep experience on all three major providers, with the infrastructure-as-code discipline to make advice reproducible.
The moments where a second opinion is cheaper than the decision going wrong.
Spend rising quarter on quarter with nobody able to explain which workloads are driving it.
A commitment about to be signed, where licensing, egress, and managed service fit will shape cost for years.
A SOC 2, ISO 27001, or customer security review approaching, and no independent view of the gaps.
An internal platform group that needs reference architecture and guardrails rather than more headcount.
Every engagement is framed so the value is checkable after the fact.
Optimisation findings come with a projected monthly saving per item, so you can prioritise on return rather than effort.
Security and reliability gaps written down, ranked, and owned, which turns unknown exposure into a managed backlog.
Guardrails and reusable modules let product teams provision what they need without waiting on a central queue.
Written architecture decisions with the trade-offs recorded, so the reasoning outlives the people who made it.
Advice is only worth having when the adviser has nothing riding on the answer.
Learn more about us →We take no margin on cloud spend from any provider, so the recommendation is not quietly priced into our revenue.
The people reviewing your architecture build and operate these systems, so the findings come with implementation detail.
You get the findings that matter with effort and impact attached, not a hundred-page audit nobody reads past page ten.
Recommendations arrive with reference code and module examples, not just principles.
Scope, access, independence, and what you actually receive.
Book a review and we will assess architecture, spend, and risk, then tell you what to fix first.
Book a Cloud Review →